This is not how I saw the future when I was a child. I really thought we would have flying cars by now. The Jetson’s was set in 2062, we should have the basic infrastructure for cloud cities by now.
But instead, humanity decided to go in a different direction.
Today, in 2021, we remain stuck in our societal past. We are so trapped by the allure of superiority that we can’t work on building a new world. Maybe, if we hadn’t been so busy hating each other, we might have built nice things, but instead humans became so good at hating each other that they found ways to hate themselves.
This fall, those of us in Pennsylvania will vote on three ballot questions. The agreed upon answers will be incorporated into the state’s legislation and policies. Everyone has their right to an opinion, but just in case you can’t form one on your own, political groups are happy to tell you how to think.
We are divided in many ways, but the arbitrary barriers created by the labels of “Democrat” and “Republican” are the most insidious, slowly mutating the bearers into base creatures of reaction. There are many things which make us unique, yet political labels ignore all of that.
I was always a Republican, and I thank Donald Trump for showing me the cultist trappings of politics. I have friends who are Democrats, and a few of my wives have been Democrats; I don’t know why I thought they were different. Lately within the Democrat Party there has been a schism between “Democrats,” “Liberals,” and “Progressives.” They are tearing themselves apart because they are NOT a monolith. Unfortunately, they refuse to split into different parties, so knowing how someone is registered tells you little about the person. So should being a Republican, but they are supposed to be more monolithic.
I am conservative. I am also Caucasian, over sixty, a veteran, bisexual, a musician, a science nerd, and a writer. That is far too complicated for some people. People who find that too complicated prefer to fix on one attribute, then experience pain when I am not one hundred percent that way. Tough. It is not my responsibility to foster the intellectual growth of bigots. But they think it is their responsibility to help me “grow” into seeing things their way. Pity turns to disgust. I sincerely don’t want to see the world through the lenses of bigotry.
Back to our ballot questions. One of them is:
QUESTION 3: The third question on your 2021 PA Primary ballot asks whether the state constitution should specifically prohibit the denial of equal rights based on race or ethnicity.This amendment offers additional protection against laws or policies that would deny Communities of Color their legal rights. It codifies the progress many Pennsylvanians have fought for for so long.
The Pennsylvania Democratic party recommends a “Yes” vote on this questions. Members of the party disagree and are rallying to support a “No” vote. Those “in the know” about discrimination believe that white people will use the amendment to bring suits claiming they were discriminated against. I thought we passed legislation on what it will do now, not how it might be interpreted in the future; if we could I would be voting for flying cars.
I question anyone who claims to be “in the know” about anything. Having spent a little time in the intelligence community, I know how easy it is to falsify credentials, and making false claims about one’s knowledge appears to be a national pastime. I have had many friends who understood one concept better than I, but ignore the opportunity to understand other concepts.
One Democrat who is so entrenched in her belief she is superior to others that she lobbies against her own party’s position had a fascinating exchange with me the other day, defending her defense of Racism. I have never been so disgusted in my life. Here was a woman who claimed to be an activist against racism actually promoting the continued practice of racism. Was she afraid of losing her job?
It wasn’t too painful, watching her give all the excuses Republicans give to vote against equality, I knew she wasn’t unique. It was when she went hyperbolic, expecting me to bask in the glow of her authority. As she continued arguing against equality now because it might be misused in the future, her remarks started to show her true colors. When she got to the point of dismissing me as an “old white dude” I had read all of her racist, sexist, and ageist misconceptions I could handle.
“Real Racism,” which she claimed to be against. is negatively judging people by their race (white). “Real ageism” is negatively judging people by their age (old). “Real sexism” is negatively judging people by their sex (dude). But those definitions exist only in the real world. In the world of paranoid activism, any insult is justified by right of superiority. There is abosulutely nothing preventing this activist from utilizing the tools she claims to be fighting against. Kind of like when a young vegan woman spent an evening explaining the evils of killing animals, in her leather boots and coat. You don’t have to live it to be an activist, you just have to put people down because they don’t agree with you. I wonder if she considers herself a “free thinker.”
Those of us who DO think freely do not tell other people how to think. We give advice, offer our opinions, but rarely use labels such as “right” and “wrong.” Thinking is never wrong, as long as it is actual thinking and not simply parroting someone else. People who disagree with me often provide another way of looking at the same issue. On occasion I change my position. That could not happen if I labeled their thoughts as “wrong” from the beginning. Nothing is to be learned from a person held in derision.
Being called an “Old White Dude” by an Old White Woman doesn’t hurt me. In fact, I am considering changing the name of this blog to “Thoughts from an Old White Dude.” Being told to vote for racism by a racist doesn’t draw me towards their point of view.
So if you are in Pennsylvania, please vote “Yes” on question #3. We can’t legislate love but at least we can legislate against hate. Just like any legislation we have no control over how it is used in the future, it is designed to eliminate suffering now. Unless hate is what pays your bills, in which case it is in your best interests to vote “No.”