So you say you want a revolution?

I apologize for the political nature of many of my posts recently. I promise to write about less controversial subjects next week. Besides, there hasn’t been any discussion in the comments, which either means you all agree with me, or I’m scaring people away.

There was an article today that grasped my imagination more than usual. Farleigh Dickinson University released the findings of a poll that suggests three in ten Americans believe that an armed rebellion will be necessary in the next few years to protect civil liberties.

Not being a headline believer, I found even more interesting information in the article. The same poll revealed that one in four Americans believe the Sandy Hook shooting occurred in order to advance a political agenda. That is to say, it was an act of the government, not a mentally unstable young man. The relationship between the two percentages seemed an odd coincidence. Although the sample was 863 registered voters, I’m having difficulty believing it was a random representation of Americans. It is possible that registered voters do not represent the average American, I would tend to think that in the non political sense, registered voters tend to be more conservative, believing in democracy.

A look at conspiracy theories finds that if someone believes one theory, they are more likely to believe in other conspiracies. This does not mean these people are paranoid, it means they find conspiracies more comforting than the idea of random crazy individuals. I’ve often thought this was the reason the JFK assassination theories are so popular. It’s easier to believe a massive plot is required than to believe that one lone gunman can assassinate the President of the United States.

I have known a variety of ersatz revolutionaries, and a few real ones. Seeing the real thing tends to make you very aware of what is missing in the posers. Were an armed rebellion to take place, my experience with the American on the street indicates that the populace will support whoever appears to be winning at the moment. It’s much more fun to wave a flag than to be on the front lines. We’ve become a nation of internet activists, clicking “like” is in no way equivalent to exchanging fire with your countrymen. The current epidemic of post traumatic stress syndrome appears to validate the notion that taking a life in reality is not as gentle on the soul as playing a video game.

War sucks. It sucks so much that it should be our very last resort. I had thought that watching footage from Viet Nam every evening had convinced a generation of that fact. Unfortunately, that was two generations ago, the generation in between came to see war zones as video games, this generation is paying the price for that naivete. President Clinton eviscerated the intelligence community and believed he could just fire cruise missiles. In the ensuing years our Presidents (and in a more extreme sense their targets) have paid the price for inaccurate targeting. Armed rebellion mean dead people. Dead neighbors and relatives. Not just on television, but blood on the living room carpet.

I hear the talk. I’ve spoken it myself in the past. I’m not really worried about people who stockpile weapons. I don’t own any firearms, I am perfectly capable of defending myself and my family with what is left behind after the first skirmishes. I just don’t think it will ever get that far. I know how to survive, working with animals taught me the principle of “being the bigger dog”. Big dogs don’t bark, they just bite. It is my belief that all the barking about armed rebellion is coming from the chihuahuas.

I do worry. I worry about those caught up in the rhetoric. I worry about those who become caught up in the moment and commit acts they can never wash away. I believe the lesson to learn from the recent bombings in Boston is not what two misguided young men can accomplish, but the psychological impact that the bombing has on the surviving brother.

There is the very real possibility that we’re on the eve of destruction, and even though when Barry McGuire rewrote his song last year he didn’t include the allusions to nuclear war, the threat still exists. North Korea shows no awareness of the effects of nuclear weapons. Iran continues to press the envelope of diplomatic relations. India and Pakistan nearly started a nuclear exchange a few years ago. Our biggest post Soviet era fear was that nuclear weapons in the former Soviet Union would fall into the hands of criminals, the underworld,  or terrorists. As we look at the current war in Syria, we see a society that has broken down, it’s not just “anti-government” forces, every feud between groups is being fought simultaneously. Unstable nuclear armed states are the scariest of current scenarios. In case anyone forgot, we’re a nuclear armed state. There’ll be no one to save, from a world in a grave.



3 comments on “So you say you want a revolution?

  1. Mari Collier says:

    My son is one of those that believes it will happen, but that the government will attack first. I do not know why he believes this way. He too believes the government is chipping away at our civil liberties one by one. The poll may have been more accurate than you wish to believe.


  2. shelly eames says:

    first off, what would you want to be less of anything for? I loved the other piece you wrote. your 2 entries i’ve read have been very thought provoking, and i love that.second…I would love to see an evolution! all revolutions seem to end up exchanging one form of oppressive power for another. when something like the boston situation happens, my heart is always so heavy with a battering awareness that there are tons of violent, tragic atrocities occurring every second, everywhere, and the media seems to control where we put both our attention, and our compassion. I don’t know if it is cyber culture shock, due to my age, or what, it seems to me, tho, that the govt. is controlling more and more of what we see, what we can choose, and if I see one more wrinkle cream commercial starring a 25 year old, I feel like I will lose my mind. smirk. we are so externally focused in this county, commercialism is geared toward creating “needs” where there were none before. for me, an evolution would entail a government that encouraged every individual to discover and celebrate their own uniqueness from WITHIN rather than being pressured into wearing the right clothes, buying the right wrinkle cream, with an underlying pressure to fit in, rather than stand out. gosh, i’m rambling. an evolution would be grand. with this new talk of invasive drones that I’ve heard about, it seems to me that that is a form of violence. i’m with you, k, all I need to be armed with are my wits, smile. the rest will take care of itself in the moment. thanks for your thought provoking entries, if you hadn’t threatened to tone it down, I probably would not have posted this. smile…have peace…shel


  3. Circe says:

    At some point, the whole thing needs to be washed clean. A few blue green algae will survive, and eventually plants and forests will regrow. The earth is too ecologically damaged to take much more: Dams, fracking, nukes, war, high ways and strip malls.
    My young idealist, who cares little about the government, and much about the environment, is off to Vermont and organic farming. Vermont is among our last safe havens, (yet, I believe, requires and houses a few nuclear power plants.) This is unsustainable. This is not Armageddon, but life as we practice it: unsustainable and destructive. As The Beatles suggested, armed revolutions are not helping much. “War, huh….What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Say it again” (Edwin Starr.)

    Even Democrats are conservative these days.There is no “conspiracy,” per se, unless Adam Smith started it with his wrong-headed economic theory. Capitalism and greed are destroying us.
    We are a splintered society. There is no wholeness in us. (And in wholeness, “the Dark and the Light are Both the Same.” Psalm 139.) For every 18-year-old who wants to start a sustainable community, there is another who wants to don a uniform and kill people in distant lands. Killing “the other” is seemingly the easiest solution to excising the tumor within. “War is not the answer.”


What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s